VRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 10.94%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9.46%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.75%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $142.83 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that Emerson Electric has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Emerson Electric is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.431%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $485M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 33.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.76x versus 4.55x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -147.12%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.75%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.257%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.76x versus 2.04x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -9.07%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.75%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -25.99%. Given that Vertiv Holdings has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Vertiv Holdings is more attractive than Tecogen.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.02%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.76x versus 6.38x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 3.68%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.75%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.79%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.474%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Ultralife's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while Ultralife's PE ratio is 26.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.76x versus 0.83x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.