CNTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of -15.8% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of 9.06%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -104.1% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 5.39%.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 51.82%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $314.82 which suggests that it could grow by 6.27%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than Flutter Entertainment PLC, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than Flutter Entertainment PLC.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.149, which suggesting that the stock is 114.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.687%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $130.4M, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Century Casinos's net income of -$20.6M is lower than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $332M. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 102.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.13x versus 3.75x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of -15.8% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of 10.59%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -104.1% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98%.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 51.82%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $112.64 which suggests that it could grow by 14.95%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.149, which suggesting that the stock is 114.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.09%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $130.4M, which are smaller than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $774M. Century Casinos's net income of -$20.6M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $82M. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.13x versus 2.74x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -15.8% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of -48.38%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -104.1% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -451.9%.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 51.82%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 183.69%. Given that High Roller Technologies has higher upside potential than Century Casinos, analysts believe High Roller Technologies is more attractive than Century Casinos.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.149, which suggesting that the stock is 114.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $130.4M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $6.8M. Century Casinos's net income of -$20.6M is lower than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.13x versus 0.83x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of -15.8% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of 2.03%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -104.1% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 4.52%.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 51.82%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $16.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.99%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.149, which suggesting that the stock is 114.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.777, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.699%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $130.4M, which are smaller than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $262.4M. Century Casinos's net income of -$20.6M is lower than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is 186.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.13x versus 2.41x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.