DKNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 11.24%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.42%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.63, signalling upside risk potential of 21.38%. On the other hand Boyd Gaming has an analysts' consensus of $85.77 which suggests that it could grow by 4.99%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.670, which suggesting that the stock is 66.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.763%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boyd Gaming offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming pays out 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues of $991.6M. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Boyd Gaming's net income of $111.4M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Boyd Gaming's PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.30x versus 1.86x for Boyd Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 9.06%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 5.39%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.63, signalling upside risk potential of 21.38%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $314.82 which suggests that it could grow by 6.27%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Flutter Entertainment PLC, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Flutter Entertainment PLC.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.670, which suggesting that the stock is 66.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.687%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.7B. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $332M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 102.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.30x versus 3.75x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 10.59%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.63, signalling upside risk potential of 21.38%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $112.64 which suggests that it could grow by 14.95%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.670, which suggesting that the stock is 66.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.09%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $774M. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $82M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.30x versus 2.74x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 2.03%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 4.52%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.63, signalling upside risk potential of 21.38%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $16.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.99%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.670, which suggesting that the stock is 66.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.777, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.699%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $262.4M. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $5.3M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is 186.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.30x versus 2.41x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.