BHRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens & Northern has a net margin of 33.22% compared to Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net margin of 23.66%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's return on equity of 8.91% beat Citizens & Northern's return on equity of 9.91%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a consensus price target of $69.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Citizens & Northern has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.38%. Given that Burke & Herbert Financial Services has higher upside potential than Citizens & Northern, analysts believe Burke & Herbert Financial Services is more attractive than Citizens & Northern.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.356% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens & Northern has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.694%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Citizens & Northern offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays 80.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens & Northern pays out 59.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than Citizens & Northern quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net income of $27.2M is higher than Citizens & Northern's net income of $6.3M. Notably, Burke & Herbert Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.07x while Citizens & Northern's PE ratio is 11.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burke & Herbert Financial Services is 2.90x versus 2.80x for Citizens & Northern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fifth Third Bancorp has a net margin of 33.22% compared to Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net margin of 24.76%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's return on equity of 8.91% beat Fifth Third Bancorp's return on equity of 11.65%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a consensus price target of $69.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Fifth Third Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $46.75 which suggests that it could grow by 8.6%. Given that Burke & Herbert Financial Services has higher upside potential than Fifth Third Bancorp, analysts believe Burke & Herbert Financial Services is more attractive than Fifth Third Bancorp.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.356% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fifth Third Bancorp has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.358%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Fifth Third Bancorp offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays 80.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Fifth Third Bancorp pays out 50.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are smaller than Fifth Third Bancorp quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net income of $27.2M is lower than Fifth Third Bancorp's net income of $515M. Notably, Burke & Herbert Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.07x while Fifth Third Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burke & Herbert Financial Services is 2.90x versus 3.54x for Fifth Third Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southside Bancshares has a net margin of 33.22% compared to Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net margin of 33.77%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's return on equity of 8.91% beat Southside Bancshares's return on equity of 11%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a consensus price target of $69.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Southside Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.37%. Given that Burke & Herbert Financial Services has higher upside potential than Southside Bancshares, analysts believe Burke & Herbert Financial Services is more attractive than Southside Bancshares.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.356% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southside Bancshares has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.282%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Southside Bancshares offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays 80.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Southside Bancshares pays out 49.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than Southside Bancshares quarterly revenues of $63.7M. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net income of $27.2M is higher than Southside Bancshares's net income of $21.5M. Notably, Burke & Herbert Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.07x while Southside Bancshares's PE ratio is 10.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burke & Herbert Financial Services is 2.90x versus 3.60x for Southside Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 33.22% compared to Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net margin of 24.09%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's return on equity of 8.91% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a consensus price target of $69.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Burke & Herbert Financial Services, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Burke & Herbert Financial Services.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.356% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays 80.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net income of $27.2M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Burke & Herbert Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.07x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burke & Herbert Financial Services is 2.90x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.