ASTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cisco Systems has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 17.61%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat Cisco Systems's return on equity of 21.48%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.4%. On the other hand Cisco Systems has an analysts' consensus of $70.51 which suggests that it could grow by 4.66%. Given that Cisco Systems has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe Cisco Systems is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.268, which suggesting that the stock is 126.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.694%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cisco Systems offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems pays out 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than Cisco Systems quarterly revenues of $14.1B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is lower than Cisco Systems's net income of $2.5B. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cisco Systems's PE ratio is 27.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 2,044.45x versus 4.86x for Cisco Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -6.72%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -21.64%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.4%. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.268, which suggesting that the stock is 126.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.6M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is lower than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$240K. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 2,044.45x versus 0.39x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 42.61%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.4%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.06 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.268, which suggesting that the stock is 126.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 2,044.45x versus 28.54x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viasat has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -21.45%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat Viasat's return on equity of -11.66%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.4%. On the other hand Viasat has an analysts' consensus of $18.29 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.268, which suggesting that the stock is 126.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viasat has a beta of 1.171, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.117%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viasat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viasat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than Viasat quarterly revenues of $1.1B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is higher than Viasat's net income of -$246.1M. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viasat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 2,044.45x versus 0.44x for Viasat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.