VSAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AST SpaceMobile has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of -6365.74%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1%.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand AST SpaceMobile has an analysts' consensus of $46.63 which suggests that it could fall by -11.4%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.801%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AST SpaceMobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AST SpaceMobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues of $718K. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AST SpaceMobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.44x versus 2,044.45x for AST SpaceMobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BK Technologies has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of 11.19%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85%.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.47%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Viasat, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Viasat.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.873%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 15.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.44x versus 1.99x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommScope Holding has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of 70.49%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat CommScope Holding's return on equity of --.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand CommScope Holding has an analysts' consensus of $5.10 which suggests that it could fall by -32.09%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.561%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommScope Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommScope Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CommScope Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than CommScope Holding's net income of $784M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CommScope Holding's PE ratio is 2.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.44x versus 0.36x for CommScope Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ubiquiti has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of 27.17%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat Ubiquiti's return on equity of 265.07%.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand Ubiquiti has an analysts' consensus of $343.50 which suggests that it could fall by -18.6%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than Ubiquiti.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.344, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.359%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ubiquiti offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti pays out 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Ubiquiti quarterly revenues of $664.2M. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than Ubiquiti's net income of $180.4M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ubiquiti's PE ratio is 46.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.44x versus 11.00x for Ubiquiti. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.