ALRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuit has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 36.37%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Intuit's return on equity of 18.57%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $804.19 which suggests that it could grow by 7.8%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Intuit.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.481%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is lower than Intuit's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Intuit's PE ratio is 60.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.39x versus 11.68x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Life360 has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 4.23%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Life360's return on equity of 2.93%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Life360 has an analysts' consensus of $61.29 which suggests that it could fall by -13%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Life360, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Life360.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life360 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life360 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life360 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are larger than Life360 quarterly revenues of $103.6M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is higher than Life360's net income of $4.4M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Life360's PE ratio is 640.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.39x versus 13.81x for Life360. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Associates has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 20.01%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Manhattan Associates has an analysts' consensus of $206.11 which suggests that it could grow by 3.06%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.552%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Associates offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Associates pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are smaller than Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues of $262.8M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is lower than Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Manhattan Associates's PE ratio is 57.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.39x versus 11.79x for Manhattan Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 3.04%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $296.88 which suggests that it could grow by 30.94%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Alarm.com Holdings, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Alarm.com Holdings.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.122%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is lower than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Workday's PE ratio is 125.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.39x versus 7.02x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.