MANH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alarm.com Holdings has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 11.7%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $206.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Alarm.com Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $67.43 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.32%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alarm.com Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alarm.com Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are larger than Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues of $238.8M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is higher than Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.14x while Alarm.com Holdings's PE ratio is 23.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 11.79x versus 3.39x for Alarm.com Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bentley Systems has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 24.66%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Bentley Systems's return on equity of 25.13%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $206.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Bentley Systems has an analysts' consensus of $51.61 which suggests that it could fall by -10.26%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Bentley Systems, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Bentley Systems.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bentley Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bentley Systems offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems pays out 30.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are smaller than Bentley Systems quarterly revenues of $370.5M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is lower than Bentley Systems's net income of $91.4M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.14x while Bentley Systems's PE ratio is 72.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 11.79x versus 13.85x for Bentley Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 15.67%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of 2.65%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $206.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $243.54 which suggests that it could grow by 10.65%. Given that Guidewire Software has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Guidewire Software is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.121%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $293.5M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is higher than Guidewire Software's net income of $46M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.14x while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 550.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 11.79x versus 16.37x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of -3797.18%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Strategy's return on equity of -43.87%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $206.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Strategy has an analysts' consensus of $536.71 which suggests that it could grow by 17.73%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy has a beta of 3.700, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 269.959%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are larger than Strategy quarterly revenues of $111.1M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is higher than Strategy's net income of -$4.2B. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.14x while Strategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 11.79x versus 212.05x for Strategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.