VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 17.25%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $152.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.83%. On the other hand ConocoPhillips has an analysts' consensus of $117.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.86%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.616, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.357%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. ConocoPhillips offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are larger than ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.60x while ConocoPhillips's PE ratio is 11.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.35x versus 1.92x for ConocoPhillips. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -0.24%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $152.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.83%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $179.60 which suggests that it could grow by 4.2%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.787%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.60x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 24.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.35x versus 0.41x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.6%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $152.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.83%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $134.92 which suggests that it could grow by 9.1%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.127%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.60x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.35x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 9.52%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $152.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.83%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.60x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.35x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.