MPC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of -6.54%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -88.27%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $179.60, signalling upside risk potential of 4.2%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.08 which suggests that it could fall by -21.08%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Delek US Holdings, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Delek US Holdings.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.882, which suggesting that the stock is 11.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.221%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are larger than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$172.7M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.41x versus 0.14x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MPLX LP has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 39%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat MPLX LP's return on equity of 31.89%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $179.60, signalling upside risk potential of 4.2%. On the other hand MPLX LP has an analysts' consensus of $56.03 which suggests that it could grow by 11.01%. Given that MPLX LP has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe MPLX LP is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.882, which suggesting that the stock is 11.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPLX LP has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.445%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. MPLX LP offers a yield of 7.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP pays out 83.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are larger than MPLX LP quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is lower than MPLX LP's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while MPLX LP's PE ratio is 11.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.41x versus 4.60x for MPLX LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 1.6%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $179.60, signalling upside risk potential of 4.2%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $134.92 which suggests that it could grow by 9.1%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.882, which suggesting that the stock is 11.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.127%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are larger than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.41x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of -1.97%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $179.60, signalling upside risk potential of 4.2%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $152.97 which suggests that it could grow by 6.83%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.882, which suggesting that the stock is 11.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.281%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are larger than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 50.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.41x versus 0.35x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.