SPG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 28.14% compared to Simon Property Group's net margin of 20.63%. Simon Property Group's return on equity of 58.53% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 9.07%.

Simon Property Group has a consensus price target of $181.37, signalling upside risk potential of 12.32%. On the other hand Federal Realty Investment Trust has an analysts' consensus of $111.44 which suggests that it could grow by 18.13%. Given that Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, analysts believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more attractive than Simon Property Group.

Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.795%.

Simon Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Federal Realty Investment Trust offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Simon Property Group pays 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 125.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Simon Property Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues of $309.2M. Simon Property Group's net income of $414.5M is higher than Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $63.8M. Notably, Simon Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.71x while Federal Realty Investment Trust's PE ratio is 27.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simon Property Group is 8.79x versus 6.53x for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macerich has a net margin of 28.14% compared to Simon Property Group's net margin of -20.11%. Simon Property Group's return on equity of 58.53% beat Macerich's return on equity of -4.48%.

Simon Property Group has a consensus price target of $181.37, signalling upside risk potential of 12.32%. On the other hand Macerich has an analysts' consensus of $18.64 which suggests that it could grow by 13.61%. Given that Macerich has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, analysts believe Macerich is more attractive than Simon Property Group.

Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macerich has a beta of 2.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.106%.

Simon Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Macerich offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Simon Property Group pays 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Macerich pays out -83.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Simon Property Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Macerich quarterly revenues of $249.2M. Simon Property Group's net income of $414.5M is higher than Macerich's net income of -$50.1M. Notably, Simon Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.71x while Macerich's PE ratio is 50.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simon Property Group is 8.79x versus 3.96x for Macerich. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 28.14% compared to Simon Property Group's net margin of 27.71%. Simon Property Group's return on equity of 58.53% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

Simon Property Group has a consensus price target of $181.37, signalling upside risk potential of 12.32%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $118.65 which suggests that it could grow by 7.7%. Given that Simon Property Group has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe Simon Property Group is more attractive than Prologis.

Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.179%.

Simon Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Simon Property Group pays 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Simon Property Group's is not.

Simon Property Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Simon Property Group's net income of $414.5M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, Simon Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.71x while Prologis's PE ratio is 27.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simon Property Group is 8.79x versus 12.54x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 28.14% compared to Simon Property Group's net margin of 28.77%. Simon Property Group's return on equity of 58.53% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74%.

Simon Property Group has a consensus price target of $181.37, signalling upside risk potential of 12.32%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.15 which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Regency Centers has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, analysts believe Regency Centers is more attractive than Simon Property Group.

Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0059999999999949%.

Simon Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Simon Property Group pays 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Simon Property Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $380.9M. Simon Property Group's net income of $414.5M is higher than Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Simon Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.71x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 32.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simon Property Group is 8.79x versus 8.61x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.