MAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Funko has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Mattel's net margin of -14.46%. Mattel's return on equity of 24.74% beat Funko's return on equity of -8.65%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $24.18, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Funko has an analysts' consensus of $6.25 which suggests that it could grow by 34.12%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Funko has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.127%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Funko offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Funko pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $826.6M, which are larger than Funko quarterly revenues of $190.7M. Mattel's net income of -$40.3M is lower than Funko's net income of -$27.6M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Funko's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.23x versus 0.24x for Funko. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hasbro has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Mattel's net margin of 11.12%. Mattel's return on equity of 24.74% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $24.18, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $80.11 which suggests that it could grow by 5.52%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Hasbro.

Mattel has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.588, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.246%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $826.6M, which are smaller than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $887.1M. Mattel's net income of -$40.3M is lower than Hasbro's net income of $98.6M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Hasbro's PE ratio is 25.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.23x versus 2.50x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Mattel's net margin of -2.1%. Mattel's return on equity of 24.74% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $24.18, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $36.50 which suggests that it could grow by 87.85%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.596%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $826.6M, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $113.3M. Mattel's net income of -$40.3M is lower than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 4.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.23x versus 0.31x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Playboy has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Mattel's net margin of -31.31%. Mattel's return on equity of 24.74% beat Playboy's return on equity of -3855.97%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $24.18, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Playboy has an analysts' consensus of $2.40 which suggests that it could grow by 34.83%. Given that Playboy has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Playboy is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Playboy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Playboy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Playboy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $826.6M, which are larger than Playboy quarterly revenues of $28.9M. Mattel's net income of -$40.3M is lower than Playboy's net income of -$9M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Playboy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.23x versus 0.96x for Playboy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.