PLBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of -31.31% compared to Playboy's net margin of -2.1%. Playboy's return on equity of -3855.97% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74%.

Playboy has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $36.50 which suggests that it could grow by 87.85%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Playboy, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Playboy.

Playboy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.596%.

Playboy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Playboy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Playboy quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $113.3M. Playboy's net income of -$9M is lower than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Playboy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 4.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy is 0.96x versus 0.31x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -31.31% compared to Playboy's net margin of -4.88%. Playboy's return on equity of -3855.97% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Playboy has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.18 which suggests that it could grow by 23.36%. Given that Playboy has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Playboy is more attractive than Mattel.

Playboy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.704%.

Playboy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Playboy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Playboy quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Playboy's net income of -$9M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Playboy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy is 0.96x versus 1.23x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive has a net margin of -31.31% compared to Playboy's net margin of -7.64%. Playboy's return on equity of -3855.97% beat Peloton Interactive's return on equity of --.

Playboy has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $8.80 which suggests that it could grow by 37.87%. Given that Peloton Interactive has higher upside potential than Playboy, analysts believe Peloton Interactive is more attractive than Playboy.

Playboy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.905%.

Playboy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Peloton Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Playboy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Playboy quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than Peloton Interactive quarterly revenues of $624M. Playboy's net income of -$9M is higher than Peloton Interactive's net income of -$47.7M. Notably, Playboy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Peloton Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy is 0.96x versus 0.97x for Peloton Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SRM Entertainment has a net margin of -31.31% compared to Playboy's net margin of -59.34%. Playboy's return on equity of -3855.97% beat SRM Entertainment's return on equity of -81.75%.

Playboy has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand SRM Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Playboy has higher upside potential than SRM Entertainment, analysts believe Playboy is more attractive than SRM Entertainment.

Playboy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRM Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Playboy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SRM Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Playboy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRM Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Playboy quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are larger than SRM Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Playboy's net income of -$9M is lower than SRM Entertainment's net income of -$646.6K. Notably, Playboy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SRM Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy is 0.96x versus 31.24x for SRM Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.