KMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek Logistics Partners LP has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Kinder Morgan's net margin of 15.62%. Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13% beat Delek Logistics Partners LP's return on equity of --.

Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $30.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.94%. On the other hand Delek Logistics Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $43.25 which suggests that it could fall by -2.15%. Given that Kinder Morgan has higher upside potential than Delek Logistics Partners LP, analysts believe Kinder Morgan is more attractive than Delek Logistics Partners LP.

Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek Logistics Partners LP has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.868%.

Kinder Morgan has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. Delek Logistics Partners LP offers a yield of 9.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Kinder Morgan pays 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek Logistics Partners LP pays out 143.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Delek Logistics Partners LP's is not.

Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Delek Logistics Partners LP quarterly revenues of $249.9M. Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M is higher than Delek Logistics Partners LP's net income of $39M. Notably, Kinder Morgan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.06x while Delek Logistics Partners LP's PE ratio is 14.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinder Morgan is 4.00x versus 2.34x for Delek Logistics Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enterprise Products Partners LP has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Kinder Morgan's net margin of 9.04%. Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13% beat Enterprise Products Partners LP's return on equity of 20.02%.

Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $30.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.94%. On the other hand Enterprise Products Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $35.90 which suggests that it could grow by 13.95%. Given that Enterprise Products Partners LP has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Enterprise Products Partners LP is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enterprise Products Partners LP has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.757%.

Kinder Morgan has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. Enterprise Products Partners LP offers a yield of 6.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Kinder Morgan pays 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners LP pays out 76.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Enterprise Products Partners LP quarterly revenues of $15.4B. Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M is lower than Enterprise Products Partners LP's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Kinder Morgan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.06x while Enterprise Products Partners LP's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinder Morgan is 4.00x versus 1.21x for Enterprise Products Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Kinder Morgan's net margin of -4.69%. Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $30.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.94%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $0.75 which suggests that it could fall by -6%. Given that Kinder Morgan has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Kinder Morgan is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Kinder Morgan has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinder Morgan pays 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $150.5M. Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Kinder Morgan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.06x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinder Morgan is 4.00x versus 0.06x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPC has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Kinder Morgan's net margin of 3.61%. Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13% beat RPC's return on equity of 7.14%.

Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $30.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.94%. On the other hand RPC has an analysts' consensus of $6.01 which suggests that it could grow by 29.19%. Given that RPC has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe RPC is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPC has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.668%.

Kinder Morgan has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. RPC offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Kinder Morgan pays 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. RPC pays out 37.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than RPC quarterly revenues of $332.9M. Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M is higher than RPC's net income of $12M. Notably, Kinder Morgan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.06x while RPC's PE ratio is 12.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinder Morgan is 4.00x versus 0.72x for RPC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.