RES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diversified Energy Co PLC has a net margin of 3.61% compared to RPC's net margin of --. RPC's return on equity of 7.14% beat Diversified Energy Co PLC's return on equity of -16.44%.

RPC has a consensus price target of $6.01, signalling upside risk potential of 29.19%. On the other hand Diversified Energy Co PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.05%. Given that RPC has higher upside potential than Diversified Energy Co PLC, analysts believe RPC is more attractive than Diversified Energy Co PLC.

RPC has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diversified Energy Co PLC has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.04%.

RPC has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Diversified Energy Co PLC offers a yield of 7.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. RPC pays 37.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Diversified Energy Co PLC pays out -95.01% of its earnings as a dividend. RPC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPC quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are larger than Diversified Energy Co PLC quarterly revenues of --. RPC's net income of $12M is higher than Diversified Energy Co PLC's net income of --. Notably, RPC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Diversified Energy Co PLC's PE ratio is 6.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPC is 0.72x versus 0.89x for Diversified Energy Co PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flotek Industries has a net margin of 3.61% compared to RPC's net margin of 9.72%. RPC's return on equity of 7.14% beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 12.95%.

RPC has a consensus price target of $6.01, signalling upside risk potential of 29.19%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that RPC has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe RPC is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

RPC has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.582%.

RPC has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPC pays 37.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPC quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $55.4M. RPC's net income of $12M is higher than Flotek Industries's net income of $5.4M. Notably, RPC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 28.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPC is 0.72x versus 1.98x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 3.61% compared to RPC's net margin of 16.91%. RPC's return on equity of 7.14% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

RPC has a consensus price target of $6.01, signalling upside risk potential of 29.19%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.68 which suggests that it could grow by 9.94%. Given that RPC has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe RPC is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

RPC has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.247%.

RPC has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. RPC pays 37.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPC quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. RPC's net income of $12M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, RPC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPC is 0.72x versus 4.00x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 3.61% compared to RPC's net margin of 7.47%. RPC's return on equity of 7.14% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18%.

RPC has a consensus price target of $6.01, signalling upside risk potential of 29.19%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $21.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.76%. Given that RPC has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe RPC is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

RPC has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.256%.

RPC has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPC pays 37.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPC quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are smaller than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $674.5M. RPC's net income of $12M is lower than Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M. Notably, RPC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 11.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPC is 0.72x versus 0.77x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.