K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 6.45%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat General Mills's return on equity of 24.24%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $55.72 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.692%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is higher than General Mills's net income of $294M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus 1.43x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hershey has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 7.99%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat The Hershey's return on equity of 37.93%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand The Hershey has an analysts' consensus of $167.01 which suggests that it could grow by 1.67%. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than The Hershey, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than The Hershey.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hershey has a beta of 0.300, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.956%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. The Hershey offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hershey pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than The Hershey quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is higher than The Hershey's net income of $224.2M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while The Hershey's PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus 3.73x for The Hershey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 11.87%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 14.14%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus 1.31x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WK Kellogg has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 2.72%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat WK Kellogg's return on equity of 17.67%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand WK Kellogg has an analysts' consensus of $22.70 which suggests that it could fall by -2.07%. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. WK Kellogg offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. WK Kellogg pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than WK Kellogg quarterly revenues of $663M. Kellanova's net income of $304M is higher than WK Kellogg's net income of $18M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while WK Kellogg's PE ratio is 36.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus 0.76x for WK Kellogg. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.