HRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 4.48%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -17.08%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 8.06%. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $77.72 which suggests that it could fall by -10.05%. Given that Hormel Foods has higher upside potential than The Estee Lauder Companies, analysts believe Hormel Foods is more attractive than The Estee Lauder Companies.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.223% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.463%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of $159M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.99x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.38x versus 2.11x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 12.54%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 8.06%. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $165.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.77%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.223% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.549%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $338.8M. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is higher than Interparfums's net income of $42.5M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.99x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 25.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.38x versus 2.92x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 11.72%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 8.06%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.01 which suggests that it could grow by 11.27%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.223% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.349, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.098%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.99x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.38x versus 2.17x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 0.05%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 8.06%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $65.95 which suggests that it could grow by 22.97%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.223% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.591, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.901%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.1B. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is higher than Tyson Foods's net income of $7M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.99x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 20.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.38x versus 0.36x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.