HON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compass Diversified Holdings has a net margin of 14.75% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of 2.17%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 31.71% beat Compass Diversified Holdings's return on equity of 0.85%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $247.53, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand Compass Diversified Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.65 which suggests that it could grow by 102.08%. Given that Compass Diversified Holdings has higher upside potential than Honeywell International, analysts believe Compass Diversified Holdings is more attractive than Honeywell International.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compass Diversified Holdings has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.222%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Compass Diversified Holdings offers a yield of 15.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Compass Diversified Holdings pays out 1170.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Honeywell International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Compass Diversified Holdings's is not.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than Compass Diversified Holdings quarterly revenues of $548.7M. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than Compass Diversified Holdings's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.23x while Compass Diversified Holdings's PE ratio is 39.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.95x versus 0.21x for Compass Diversified Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

3M has a net margin of 14.75% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of 18.74%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 31.71% beat 3M's return on equity of 98.97%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $247.53, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand 3M has an analysts' consensus of $155.60 which suggests that it could fall by -1.24%. Given that Honeywell International has higher upside potential than 3M, analysts believe Honeywell International is more attractive than 3M.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 3M has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.871%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. 3M offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.87% of its earnings as a dividend. 3M pays out 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than 3M quarterly revenues of $6B. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than 3M's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.23x while 3M's PE ratio is 19.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.95x versus 3.54x for 3M. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of 14.75% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of -70.61%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 31.71% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $247.53, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Honeywell International has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Honeywell International is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.474%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Honeywell International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.23x while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.95x versus 5.23x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of 14.75% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of 1.38%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 31.71% beat Seaboard's return on equity of 2.09%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $247.53, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Honeywell International has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Honeywell International is more attractive than Seaboard.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.949%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than Seaboard's net income of $32M. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.23x while Seaboard's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.95x versus 0.32x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.