Financhill
Buy
58

FLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$53.90
Seasonality move :
-0.97%
Day range:
$52.32 - $53.59
52-week range:
$29.20 - $60.10
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5.08x
P/S ratio:
0.56x
P/B ratio:
2.45x
Volume:
2.8M
Avg. volume:
4.1M
1-year change:
6.49%
Market cap:
$8.8B
Revenue:
$16.3B
EPS (TTM):
$10.53

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FLR
Fluor
$4.5B $0.56 7.62% -42.65% $51.94
ACA
Arcosa
$757.8M $1.09 21.17% 283.14% $111.83
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$177.7M $0.09 2.5% -24.25% $15.00
GVA
Granite Construction
$1.2B $1.70 6.84% 123.03% $101.75
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$198.3M -$0.01 3.19% -95% $11.13
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$554.4M $2.25 -4.89% 34.88% $256.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FLR
Fluor
$53.52 $51.94 $8.8B 5.08x $0.00 0% 0.56x
ACA
Arcosa
$87.67 $111.83 $4.3B 55.14x $0.05 0.23% 1.65x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$11.17 $15.00 $758.7M 10.95x $0.00 0% 0.94x
GVA
Granite Construction
$92.48 $101.75 $4B 38.53x $0.13 0.56% 1.15x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$8.64 $11.13 $341.7M 172.80x $0.00 0% 0.38x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$243.23 $256.33 $7.4B 28.41x $0.00 0% 3.58x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FLR
Fluor
23.24% 2.399 18.08% 1.68x
ACA
Arcosa
40.72% 1.820 44.83% 1.17x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
46.31% 1.833 70.42% 1.05x
GVA
Granite Construction
42.68% 1.831 22.13% 1.38x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
13.39% 4.054 11.27% 1.33x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
27.79% 2.912 8.95% 1.30x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FLR
Fluor
$140M $104M 46.45% 64.65% 3.01% -$297M
ACA
Arcosa
$125.4M $51.7M 2.17% 3.23% 9.1% -$34.7M
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$69.5M $49.9M 8.2% 15.97% 20.41% $39.6M
GVA
Granite Construction
$83.8M -$41.5M 7.12% 11.94% -4.62% -$28.6M
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$23M $470K 1.78% 2.24% 0.56% -$12.5M
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$94.8M $57.6M 24.94% 35.76% 14.6% $67M

Fluor vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FLR or ACA?

    Arcosa has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 3.73%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Arcosa's return on equity of 3.23%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLR
    Fluor
    3.52% -$1.42 $4.7B
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.84% $0.48 $4.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLR or ACA?

    Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -2.94%. On the other hand Arcosa has an analysts' consensus of $111.83 which suggests that it could grow by 27.56%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Fluor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLR
    Fluor
    5 5 0
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
  • Is FLR or ACA More Risky?

    Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arcosa has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.858%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLR or ACA?

    Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Arcosa offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa pays out 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLR or ACA?

    Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Arcosa quarterly revenues of $632M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Arcosa's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Arcosa's PE ratio is 55.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 1.65x for Arcosa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.56x 5.08x $4B -$241M
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.65x 55.14x $632M $23.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLR or GLDD?

    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 13.76%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLR
    Fluor
    3.52% -$1.42 $4.7B
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    28.63% $0.49 $893.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About FLR or GLDD?

    Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -2.94%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLR
    Fluor
    5 5 0
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    2 0 0
  • Is FLR or GLDD More Risky?

    Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.365%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLR or GLDD?

    Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLR or GLDD?

    Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 0.94x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.56x 5.08x $4B -$241M
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    0.94x 10.95x $242.9M $33.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLR or GVA?

    Granite Construction has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of -4.81%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 11.94%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLR
    Fluor
    3.52% -$1.42 $4.7B
    GVA
    Granite Construction
    11.99% -$0.77 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLR or GVA?

    Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -2.94%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.02%. Given that Granite Construction has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Granite Construction is more attractive than Fluor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLR
    Fluor
    5 5 0
    GVA
    Granite Construction
    2 0 0
  • Is FLR or GVA More Risky?

    Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.464%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLR or GVA?

    Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLR or GVA?

    Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $699.5M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Granite Construction's net income of -$33.7M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 38.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 1.15x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.56x 5.08x $4B -$241M
    GVA
    Granite Construction
    1.15x 38.53x $699.5M -$33.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLR or ORN?

    Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of -0.75%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLR
    Fluor
    3.52% -$1.42 $4.7B
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    12.2% -$0.04 $174.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About FLR or ORN?

    Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -2.94%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.76%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Fluor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLR
    Fluor
    5 5 0
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    3 0 0
  • Is FLR or ORN More Risky?

    Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.304%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLR or ORN?

    Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLR or ORN?

    Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 172.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 0.38x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.56x 5.08x $4B -$241M
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    0.38x 172.80x $188.7M -$1.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLR or STRL?

    Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 9.16%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLR
    Fluor
    3.52% -$1.42 $4.7B
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    22.01% $1.28 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLR or STRL?

    Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -2.94%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $256.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLR
    Fluor
    5 5 0
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    3 0 0
  • Is FLR or STRL More Risky?

    Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.296%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLR or STRL?

    Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLR or STRL?

    Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $430.9M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 28.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 3.58x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.56x 5.08x $4B -$241M
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    3.58x 28.41x $430.9M $39.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?

GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.

Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17

Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock