STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 6.22%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.5%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $256.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.39%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $533.02 which suggests that it could fall by -3.67%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than EMCOR Group, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than EMCOR Group.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.374%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.41x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 24.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.58x versus 1.71x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of -6.05%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat Fluor's return on equity of 64.65%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $256.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.39%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $51.94 which suggests that it could fall by -2.94%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.293%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4B. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is higher than Fluor's net income of -$241M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.41x while Fluor's PE ratio is 5.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.58x versus 0.56x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 13.76%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $256.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.39%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.365%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.41x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.58x versus 0.94x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of -0.75%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $256.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.39%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.76%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.304%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.41x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 172.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.58x versus 0.38x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.