FAST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 15.88% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 5.38%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.66% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 28.89%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $42.15, signalling downside risk potential of -7.57%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $233.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.36%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.239%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Fastenal's net income of $330.3M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $410M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 27.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.74x versus 1.44x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 15.88% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 9.24%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.66% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $42.15, signalling downside risk potential of -7.57%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $541.54 which suggests that it could fall by -0.93%. Given that Fastenal has more downside risk than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.508, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.842%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fastenal's net income of $330.3M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 32.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.74x versus 2.67x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 15.88% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 8.47%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.66% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 38.3%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $42.15, signalling downside risk potential of -7.57%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $340.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that IES Holdings has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe IES Holdings is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.112%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $834M. Fastenal's net income of $330.3M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $70.7M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 27.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.74x versus 2.10x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otis Worldwide has a net margin of 15.88% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 7.25%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.66% beat Otis Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $42.15, signalling downside risk potential of -7.57%. On the other hand Otis Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $104.87 which suggests that it could grow by 4.51%. Given that Otis Worldwide has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Otis Worldwide is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.22%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Otis Worldwide offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Otis Worldwide pays out 36.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Fastenal's net income of $330.3M is higher than Otis Worldwide's net income of $243M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while Otis Worldwide's PE ratio is 26.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.74x versus 2.85x for Otis Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.