FERG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 5.38% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 15.88%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 28.89% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.66%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $233.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $42.15 which suggests that it could fall by -7.57%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Fastenal.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.978%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Fastenal offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $410M is higher than Fastenal's net income of $330.3M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 43.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.44x versus 6.74x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 5.38% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 9.24%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 28.89% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $233.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $541.54 which suggests that it could fall by -0.93%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.508, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.842%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $410M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 32.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.44x versus 2.67x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 5.38% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 8.47%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 28.89% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 38.3%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $233.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $340.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.112%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $834M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $410M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $70.7M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 27.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.44x versus 2.10x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 5.38% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 10.61%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 28.89% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $233.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $186.11 which suggests that it could grow by 6.27%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.242, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.235%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $482.6M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $410M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 40.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.44x versus 4.13x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.