CHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 11.15%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat Clorox's return on equity of 270.67%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.96, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $142.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.096%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is higher than Clorox's net income of $186M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.33x while Clorox's PE ratio is 22.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.91x versus 2.25x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 4.48%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -17.08%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.96, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $77.72 which suggests that it could fall by -10.05%. Given that Church & Dwight has higher upside potential than The Estee Lauder Companies, analysts believe Church & Dwight is more attractive than The Estee Lauder Companies.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.463%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of $159M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.33x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.91x versus 2.11x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 19.06%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.96, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.527%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.33x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 24.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.91x versus 4.51x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 0.13%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.96, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.14 which suggests that it could grow by 47.45%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.074%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.33x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 26.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.91x versus 0.52x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.