SPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 14.05%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.14, signalling upside risk potential of 47.45%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $98.11 which suggests that it could grow by 11.92%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.782%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $675.7M, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.33x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 24.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.52x versus 3.61x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 11.15%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84% beat Clorox's return on equity of 270.67%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.14, signalling upside risk potential of 47.45%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $142.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Clorox.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.096%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $675.7M, which are smaller than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K is lower than Clorox's net income of $186M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.33x while Clorox's PE ratio is 22.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.52x versus 2.25x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 11.72%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.14, signalling upside risk potential of 47.45%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.01 which suggests that it could grow by 11.27%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.349, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.098%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $675.7M, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.33x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.52x versus 2.17x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.14, signalling upside risk potential of 47.45%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.858, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.783%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $675.7M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.33x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.52x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.