AES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CenterPoint Energy has a net margin of 1.57% compared to The AES's net margin of 10.17%. The AES's return on equity of 17.77% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity of 9.2%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $13.56, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand CenterPoint Energy has an analysts' consensus of $38.65 which suggests that it could grow by 7.1%. Given that CenterPoint Energy has higher upside potential than The AES, analysts believe CenterPoint Energy is more attractive than The AES.

The AES has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.508%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. CenterPoint Energy offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 51.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than CenterPoint Energy quarterly revenues of $2.9B. The AES's net income of $46M is lower than CenterPoint Energy's net income of $297M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.08x while CenterPoint Energy's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.77x versus 2.62x for CenterPoint Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Duke Energy has a net margin of 1.57% compared to The AES's net margin of 16.72%. The AES's return on equity of 17.77% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 9.35%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $13.56, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $127.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.22%. Given that Duke Energy has higher upside potential than The AES, analysts believe Duke Energy is more attractive than The AES.

The AES has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.946%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. The AES's net income of $46M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.08x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.77x versus 2.95x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluence Energy has a net margin of 1.57% compared to The AES's net margin of -7.19%. The AES's return on equity of 17.77% beat Fluence Energy's return on equity of -4.41%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $13.56, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand Fluence Energy has an analysts' consensus of $8.25 which suggests that it could fall by -0.24%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than Fluence Energy, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than Fluence Energy.

The AES has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Fluence Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluence Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The AES's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Fluence Energy quarterly revenues of $431.6M. The AES's net income of $46M is higher than Fluence Energy's net income of -$31M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.08x while Fluence Energy's PE ratio is 97.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.77x versus 0.51x for Fluence Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 1.57% compared to The AES's net margin of 13.33%. The AES's return on equity of 17.77% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 9.2%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $13.56, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $80.46 which suggests that it could grow by 7.61%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than The AES, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than The AES.

The AES has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.849%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $6.2B. The AES's net income of $46M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $833M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.08x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.77x versus 6.10x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.