FLNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NextEra Energy has a net margin of -7.19% compared to Fluence Energy's net margin of 13.33%. Fluence Energy's return on equity of -4.41% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 9.2%.

Fluence Energy has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling downside risk potential of -0.24%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $80.46 which suggests that it could grow by 7.61%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than Fluence Energy, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than Fluence Energy.

Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.849%.

Fluence Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Fluence Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluence Energy quarterly revenues are $431.6M, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Fluence Energy's net income of -$31M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $833M. Notably, Fluence Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.35x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluence Energy is 0.51x versus 6.10x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ormat Technologies has a net margin of -7.19% compared to Fluence Energy's net margin of 17.57%. Fluence Energy's return on equity of -4.41% beat Ormat Technologies's return on equity of 4.95%.

Fluence Energy has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling downside risk potential of -0.24%. On the other hand Ormat Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.40 which suggests that it could fall by -1.21%. Given that Ormat Technologies has more downside risk than Fluence Energy, analysts believe Fluence Energy is more attractive than Ormat Technologies.

Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ormat Technologies has a beta of 0.639, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.052%.

Fluence Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ormat Technologies offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Fluence Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies pays out 23.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluence Energy quarterly revenues are $431.6M, which are larger than Ormat Technologies quarterly revenues of $229.8M. Fluence Energy's net income of -$31M is lower than Ormat Technologies's net income of $40.4M. Notably, Fluence Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.35x while Ormat Technologies's PE ratio is 42.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluence Energy is 0.51x versus 6.01x for Ormat Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stem has a net margin of -7.19% compared to Fluence Energy's net margin of -76.9%. Fluence Energy's return on equity of -4.41% beat Stem's return on equity of -595.48%.

Fluence Energy has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling downside risk potential of -0.24%. On the other hand Stem has an analysts' consensus of $12.60 which suggests that it could grow by 46%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Fluence Energy, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Fluence Energy.

Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stem has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fluence Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stem offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluence Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stem pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluence Energy quarterly revenues are $431.6M, which are larger than Stem quarterly revenues of $32.5M. Fluence Energy's net income of -$31M is lower than Stem's net income of -$25M. Notably, Fluence Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.35x while Stem's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluence Energy is 0.51x versus 0.46x for Stem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.