ADM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 1.73%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 9.73%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $51.04, signalling downside risk potential of -5.48%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $89.15 which suggests that it could grow by 22.12%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.422%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is higher than Bunge Global SA's net income of $201M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.29x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 9.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus 0.20x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Campbell's has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.67%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat The Campbell's's return on equity of 11.74%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $51.04, signalling downside risk potential of -5.48%. On the other hand The Campbell's has an analysts' consensus of $37.72 which suggests that it could grow by 21.84%. Given that The Campbell's has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe The Campbell's is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's has a beta of 0.079, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.115%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. The Campbell's offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than The Campbell's quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is higher than The Campbell's's net income of $66M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.29x while The Campbell's's PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus 0.91x for The Campbell's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $51.04, signalling downside risk potential of -5.48%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer-Daniels Midland has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Archer-Daniels Midland is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.858, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.783%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.29x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 0.13%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $51.04, signalling downside risk potential of -5.48%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.14 which suggests that it could grow by 47.45%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.074%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.29x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 26.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus 0.52x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.