SMTEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dustin Group AB has a net margin of -- compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of --. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -- beat Dustin Group AB's return on equity of --.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dustin Group AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart Eye AB has higher upside potential than Dustin Group AB, analysts believe Smart Eye AB is more attractive than Dustin Group AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dustin Group AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dustin Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dustin Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dustin Group AB quarterly revenues of --. Smart Eye AB's net income of -- is lower than Dustin Group AB's net income of --. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dustin Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 6.69x versus 0.21x for Dustin Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a net margin of -- compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of 8.14%. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -- beat Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of 19.82%.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has an analysts' consensus of $7.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has higher upside potential than Smart Eye AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is more attractive than Smart Eye AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.796%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays out 46165.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Smart Eye AB's net income of -- is lower than Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $473.1M. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's PE ratio is 14.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 6.69x versus 1.04x for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neonode has a net margin of -- compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of -337.82%. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -- beat Neonode's return on equity of -39.51%.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neonode has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could fall by -41.8%. Given that Neonode has higher upside potential than Smart Eye AB, analysts believe Neonode is more attractive than Smart Eye AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neonode has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.043%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neonode offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neonode pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Neonode quarterly revenues of $513K. Smart Eye AB's net income of -- is lower than Neonode's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neonode's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 6.69x versus 134.13x for Neonode. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wyld Networks AB has a net margin of -- compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of -351.35%. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -- beat Wyld Networks AB's return on equity of -783.29%.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wyld Networks AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart Eye AB has higher upside potential than Wyld Networks AB, analysts believe Smart Eye AB is more attractive than Wyld Networks AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wyld Networks AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wyld Networks AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wyld Networks AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wyld Networks AB quarterly revenues of $277.1K. Smart Eye AB's net income of -- is lower than Wyld Networks AB's net income of -$973.7K. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wyld Networks AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 6.69x versus -- for Wyld Networks AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.