ERIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dustin Group AB has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net margin of --. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of 19.82% beat Dustin Group AB's return on equity of --.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a consensus price target of $7.93, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Dustin Group AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has higher upside potential than Dustin Group AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is more attractive than Dustin Group AB.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dustin Group AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Dustin Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays 46165.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Dustin Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Dustin Group AB quarterly revenues of --. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $473.1M is higher than Dustin Group AB's net income of --. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.69x while Dustin Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is 1.04x versus 0.21x for Dustin Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neonode has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net margin of -337.82%. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of 19.82% beat Neonode's return on equity of -39.51%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a consensus price target of $7.93, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Neonode has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could fall by -41.8%. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has higher upside potential than Neonode, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is more attractive than Neonode.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neonode has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.043%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Neonode offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays 46165.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Neonode pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Neonode quarterly revenues of $513K. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $473.1M is higher than Neonode's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.69x while Neonode's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is 1.04x versus 134.13x for Neonode. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net margin of 2.37%. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of 19.82% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 19.84%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a consensus price target of $7.93, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $44.23 which suggests that it could fall by -16.89%. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.087%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays 46165.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $473.1M is higher than Super Micro Computer's net income of $108.8M. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.69x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is 1.04x versus 1.57x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wyld Networks AB has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net margin of -351.35%. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of 19.82% beat Wyld Networks AB's return on equity of -783.29%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a consensus price target of $7.93, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Wyld Networks AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has higher upside potential than Wyld Networks AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is more attractive than Wyld Networks AB.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wyld Networks AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Wyld Networks AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays 46165.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Wyld Networks AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Wyld Networks AB quarterly revenues of $277.1K. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $473.1M is higher than Wyld Networks AB's net income of -$973.7K. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.69x while Wyld Networks AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is 1.04x versus -- for Wyld Networks AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.