GEAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compx International has a net margin of -- compared to GreetEat's net margin of 12.74%. GreetEat's return on equity of -- beat Compx International's return on equity of 11.54%.

GreetEat has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1165.12%. On the other hand Compx International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that GreetEat has higher upside potential than Compx International, analysts believe GreetEat is more attractive than Compx International.

GreetEat has a beta of 4.360, which suggesting that the stock is 336.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compx International has a beta of 1.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.332%.

GreetEat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compx International offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. GreetEat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compx International pays out 237.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

GreetEat quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Compx International quarterly revenues of $40.3M. GreetEat's net income of -- is lower than Compx International's net income of $5.1M. Notably, GreetEat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compx International's PE ratio is 17.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GreetEat is -- versus 2.14x for Compx International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -- compared to GreetEat's net margin of 5.54%. GreetEat's return on equity of -- beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

GreetEat has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1165.12%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GreetEat has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe GreetEat is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

GreetEat has a beta of 4.360, which suggesting that the stock is 336.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

GreetEat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. GreetEat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

GreetEat quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. GreetEat's net income of -- is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, GreetEat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GreetEat is -- versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Payments has a net margin of -- compared to GreetEat's net margin of 12.68%. GreetEat's return on equity of -- beat Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75%.

GreetEat has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1165.12%. On the other hand Global Payments has an analysts' consensus of $99.01 which suggests that it could grow by 19.78%. Given that GreetEat has higher upside potential than Global Payments, analysts believe GreetEat is more attractive than Global Payments.

GreetEat has a beta of 4.360, which suggesting that the stock is 336.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Payments has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.087%.

GreetEat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Payments offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. GreetEat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments pays out 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GreetEat quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Payments quarterly revenues of $2.4B. GreetEat's net income of -- is lower than Global Payments's net income of $305.7M. Notably, GreetEat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Payments's PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GreetEat is -- versus 2.06x for Global Payments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to GreetEat's net margin of -16.21%. GreetEat's return on equity of -- beat TOMI Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -57.67%.

GreetEat has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1165.12%. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 264.51%. Given that GreetEat has higher upside potential than TOMI Environmental Solutions, analysts believe GreetEat is more attractive than TOMI Environmental Solutions.

GreetEat has a beta of 4.360, which suggesting that the stock is 336.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.572%.

GreetEat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOMI Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GreetEat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GreetEat quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOMI Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.6M. GreetEat's net income of -- is lower than TOMI Environmental Solutions's net income of -$255.6K. Notably, GreetEat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TOMI Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GreetEat is -- versus 2.41x for TOMI Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.