DBMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of 15.88%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.66%.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $42.15 which suggests that it could fall by -7.57%. Given that Fastenal has higher upside potential than DBM Global, analysts believe Fastenal is more attractive than DBM Global.

DBM Global has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.978%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Fastenal offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $2.1B. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than Fastenal's net income of $330.3M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fastenal's PE ratio is 43.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 6.74x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of 13.76%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than DBM Global, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than DBM Global.

DBM Global has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.365%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 0.94x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of -1.9%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -55.72%.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.87%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than DBM Global, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than DBM Global.

DBM Global has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.5M. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 0.24x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovate has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of -8.94%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat Innovate's return on equity of --.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 850.57%. Given that Innovate has higher upside potential than DBM Global, analysts believe Innovate is more attractive than DBM Global.

DBM Global has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovate has a beta of 1.718, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.801%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Innovate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovate pays out -3.47% of its earnings as a dividend.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innovate quarterly revenues of $274.2M. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than Innovate's net income of -$24.5M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 0.07x for Innovate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.