CEHCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Idemitsu Kosan has a net margin of 3.15% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 1.18%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 7.96% beat Idemitsu Kosan's return on equity of 5.73%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Idemitsu Kosan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Idemitsu Kosan, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than Idemitsu Kosan.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idemitsu Kosan has a beta of 0.017, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.312%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. Idemitsu Kosan offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 45.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Idemitsu Kosan pays out 44.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Idemitsu Kosan quarterly revenues of $15.6B. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $148.2M is lower than Idemitsu Kosan's net income of $183.6M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Idemitsu Kosan's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.14x for Idemitsu Kosan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inpex has a net margin of 3.15% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 23.52%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 7.96% beat Inpex's return on equity of 7.85%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inpex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Inpex, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than Inpex.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inpex has a beta of 0.547, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.3%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. Inpex offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 45.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Inpex pays out 23.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Inpex quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $148.2M is lower than Inpex's net income of $828.2M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Inpex's PE ratio is 6.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 1.12x for Inpex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Japan Petroleum Exploration has a net margin of 3.15% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 58.44%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 7.96% beat Japan Petroleum Exploration's return on equity of 14.74%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Petroleum Exploration has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Japan Petroleum Exploration, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than Japan Petroleum Exploration.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Petroleum Exploration has a beta of -0.106, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.572%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. Japan Petroleum Exploration offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 45.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Petroleum Exploration pays out 19.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Japan Petroleum Exploration quarterly revenues of $598M. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $148.2M is lower than Japan Petroleum Exploration's net income of $349.4M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Japan Petroleum Exploration's PE ratio is 3.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.70x for Japan Petroleum Exploration. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ENEOS Holdings has a net margin of 3.15% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 3.15%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 7.96% beat ENEOS Holdings's return on equity of 6.28%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ENEOS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than ENEOS Holdings, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than ENEOS Holdings.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ENEOS Holdings has a beta of 0.318, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.157%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. ENEOS Holdings offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 45.43% of its earnings as a dividend. ENEOS Holdings pays out 30.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than ENEOS Holdings quarterly revenues of $21.4B. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $148.2M is lower than ENEOS Holdings's net income of $672.2M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while ENEOS Holdings's PE ratio is 9.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.17x for ENEOS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.