Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
74
USFD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$83.80
Seasonality move
:
-1.2%
Day range:
$80.90 - $82.95
52-week range:
$50.49 - $82.95
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
38.05x
P/S ratio:
0.52x
P/B ratio:
4.16x
Volume:
3.7M
Avg. volume:
2.1M
1-year change:
54.96%
Market cap:
$19.2B
Revenue:
$37.9B
EPS (TTM):
$2.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
$10.2B | $1.13 | 4.75% | 40.53% | $85.89 |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
$296.2M | $0.06 | -1.13% | -14.71% | $17.00 |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
$192.8M | $0.53 | 8.69% | 56.86% | $35.00 |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFGC
Performance Food Group
|
$16.8B | $1.45 | 11.09% | 34.62% | $104.00 |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
$20.9B | $1.39 | 2.22% | 12.68% | $80.07 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
$82.95 | $85.89 | $19.2B | 38.05x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.52x |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
$11.94 | $17.00 | $843.2M | 23.88x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.61x |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
$26.19 | $35.00 | $467.2M | 45.16x | $0.20 | 3.06% | 0.67x |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
$116.86 | -- | $75.4M | 46.93x | $0.18 | 0.62% | 0.03x |
|
PFGC
Performance Food Group
|
$99.91 | $104.00 | $15.6B | 41.63x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
$77.30 | $80.07 | $37.5B | 20.03x | $0.54 | 2.68% | 0.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
52.05% | 1.724 | 33.1% | 0.69x |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
21.17% | 1.263 | 19.22% | 1.13x |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
-- | -0.074 | -- | 1.32x |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
59.18% | 0.943 | 213.19% | 0.72x |
|
PFGC
Performance Food Group
|
55.56% | 1.276 | 44.52% | 0.67x |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
87.51% | 0.343 | 37% | 0.72x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
$1.6B | $229M | 5.43% | 11.17% | 2.41% | $307M |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
$28.4M | $6.9M | 5.19% | 6.47% | 1.89% | -$25M |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
$18.1M | $7.6M | 4.67% | 5.08% | 5.23% | $15.6M |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
$43M | $461.9K | 0.55% | 1.34% | 0.04% | $31.4M |
|
PFGC
Performance Food Group
|
$1.8B | $174.4M | 4.43% | 8.98% | 1.15% | $319.3M |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
$3.6B | $681M | 13.1% | 93.26% | 3.43% | $620M |
US Foods Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or AVO?
Mission Produce has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 0.82%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B AVOMission Produce7.47% $0.04 $732.6M -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or AVO?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Mission Produce has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.38%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than US Foods Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 AVOMission Produce2 0 0 -
Is USFD or AVO More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or AVO?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mission Produce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mission Produce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or AVO?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Mission Produce quarterly revenues of $380.3M. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than Mission Produce's net income of $3.1M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.05x while Mission Produce's PE ratio is 23.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.52x versus 0.61x for Mission Produce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.52x 38.05x $9.4B $115M AVOMission Produce0.61x 23.88x $380.3M $3.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or CVGW?
Calavo Growers has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 3.6%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Calavo Growers's return on equity of 5.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B CVGWCalavo Growers9.49% $0.38 $206.6M -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or CVGW?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Calavo Growers has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.64%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than US Foods Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 CVGWCalavo Growers2 0 0 -
Is USFD or CVGW More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.543%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or CVGW?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calavo Growers offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out -829.09% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or CVGW?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Calavo Growers quarterly revenues of $190.5M. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than Calavo Growers's net income of $6.9M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.05x while Calavo Growers's PE ratio is 45.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.52x versus 0.67x for Calavo Growers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.52x 38.05x $9.4B $115M CVGWCalavo Growers0.67x 45.16x $190.5M $6.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or DIT?
Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of -0.26%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B DITAmcon Distributing6.95% -$2.58 $272.8M -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or DIT?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 DITAmcon Distributing0 0 0 -
Is USFD or DIT More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.088%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or DIT?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or DIT?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.05x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 46.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.52x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.52x 38.05x $9.4B $115M DITAmcon Distributing0.03x 46.93x $619.5M -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or PFGC?
Performance Food Group has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 0.38%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B PFGCPerformance Food Group11.91% $0.37 $9.8B -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or PFGC?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Performance Food Group has an analysts' consensus of $104.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.09%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than US Foods Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 PFGCPerformance Food Group8 5 0 -
Is USFD or PFGC More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.401%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or PFGC?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Performance Food Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Performance Food Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or PFGC?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are smaller than Performance Food Group quarterly revenues of $15.3B. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.05x while Performance Food Group's PE ratio is 41.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.52x versus 0.25x for Performance Food Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.52x 38.05x $9.4B $115M PFGCPerformance Food Group0.25x 41.63x $15.3B $58.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or SYY?
Sysco has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 2.05%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Sysco's return on equity of 93.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B SYYSysco18.27% $0.82 $15.4B -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or SYY?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $80.07 which suggests that it could grow by 3.59%. Given that Sysco has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Sysco is more attractive than US Foods Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 SYYSysco7 9 0 -
Is USFD or SYY More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.016%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or SYY?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or SYY?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $19.6B. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is lower than Sysco's net income of $401M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.05x while Sysco's PE ratio is 20.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.52x versus 0.47x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.52x 38.05x $9.4B $115M SYYSysco0.47x 20.03x $19.6B $401M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.
