AVO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.82% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of -0.26%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.47% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.38%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.088%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $380.3M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. Mission Produce's net income of $3.1M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.88x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 46.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.61x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 0.82% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 0.38%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.47% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.38%. On the other hand Performance Food Group has an analysts' consensus of $104.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.09%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Performance Food Group, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Performance Food Group.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.401%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Performance Food Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Performance Food Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $380.3M, which are smaller than Performance Food Group quarterly revenues of $15.3B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.1M is lower than Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.88x while Performance Food Group's PE ratio is 41.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.61x versus 0.25x for Performance Food Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 0.82% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 2.05%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.47% beat Sysco's return on equity of 93.26%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.38%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $80.07 which suggests that it could grow by 3.59%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Sysco.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.016%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $380.3M, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $19.6B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.1M is lower than Sysco's net income of $401M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.88x while Sysco's PE ratio is 20.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.61x versus 0.47x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 0.82% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 1.23%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.47% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.38%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $85.89 which suggests that it could grow by 3.54%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.414, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.448%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $380.3M, which are smaller than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.1M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $115M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.88x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 38.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.61x versus 0.52x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.