RYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of -0.49% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 4.32%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.77% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 19.64%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.39%. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.594%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $476.6M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$5.6M is lower than DXP Enterprises's net income of $20.6M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 0.89x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of -0.49% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 1.11%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.77% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.46%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that EVI Industries has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe EVI Industries is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.033, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.66%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.5M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$5.6M is lower than EVI Industries's net income of $1M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 52.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 0.89x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of -0.49% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of -2.16%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.77% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 22.04%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.4%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.298%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $97.8M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$5.6M is lower than L.B. Foster's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 7.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 0.51x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Industrial has a net margin of -0.49% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 4.24%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.77% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.82%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.53%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.84% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.808%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $321M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$5.6M is lower than Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 0.79x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.