BXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Distribution Solutions Group has a net margin of 0.4% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 0.68%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 5.92% beat Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.18%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of $91.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Distribution Solutions Group has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.79%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than BlueLinx Holdings, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than BlueLinx Holdings.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 1.897, which suggesting that the stock is 89.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.378%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Distribution Solutions Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Distribution Solutions Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $709.2M, which are larger than Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues of $478M. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $2.8M is lower than Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $3.3M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while Distribution Solutions Group's PE ratio is 1,412.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.24x versus 0.72x for Distribution Solutions Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 0.4% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 4.32%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 5.92% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 19.64%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of $91.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.29%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 1.897, which suggesting that the stock is 89.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.594%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $709.2M, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $476.6M. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $2.8M is lower than DXP Enterprises's net income of $20.6M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.24x versus 0.86x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 0.4% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 5.85%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 5.92% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 14.3%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of $91.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of $88.84 which suggests that it could grow by 2.67%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 1.897, which suggesting that the stock is 89.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.329%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $709.2M, which are smaller than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $971.1M. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $2.8M is lower than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $56.8M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 24.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.24x versus 1.29x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resideo Technologies has a net margin of 0.4% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 0.34%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 5.92% beat Resideo Technologies's return on equity of 2.46%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of $91.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Resideo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could fall by -0.24%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than Resideo Technologies, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than Resideo Technologies.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 1.897, which suggesting that the stock is 89.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resideo Technologies has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.03%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resideo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resideo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $709.2M, which are smaller than Resideo Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.8B. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $2.8M is lower than Resideo Technologies's net income of $6M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while Resideo Technologies's PE ratio is 73.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.24x versus 0.49x for Resideo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.