PSTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HP has a net margin of -1.8% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 3.07%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.41% beat HP's return on equity of --.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $69.68, signalling upside risk potential of 27.06%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $27.21 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than HP.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.735%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HP offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $778.5M, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $13.2B. Pure Storage's net income of -$14M is lower than HP's net income of $406M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 148.22x while HP's PE ratio is 9.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 5.72x versus 0.44x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IonQ has a net margin of -1.8% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of -426.28%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.41% beat IonQ's return on equity of -64.15%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $69.68, signalling upside risk potential of 27.06%. On the other hand IonQ has an analysts' consensus of $44.17 which suggests that it could grow by 1.44%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than IonQ, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than IonQ.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IonQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IonQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IonQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $778.5M, which are larger than IonQ quarterly revenues of $7.6M. Pure Storage's net income of -$14M is higher than IonQ's net income of -$32.3M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 148.22x while IonQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 5.72x versus 220.62x for IonQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetApp has a net margin of -1.8% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 19.63%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.41% beat NetApp's return on equity of 118.55%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $69.68, signalling upside risk potential of 27.06%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $114.39 which suggests that it could grow by 9.82%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than NetApp.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.952%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 35.75% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $778.5M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Pure Storage's net income of -$14M is lower than NetApp's net income of $340M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 148.22x while NetApp's PE ratio is 18.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 5.72x versus 3.31x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of -1.8% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 2.37%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.41% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 19.84%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $69.68, signalling upside risk potential of 27.06%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $44.23 which suggests that it could fall by -16.89%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.087%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $778.5M, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Pure Storage's net income of -$14M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $108.8M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 148.22x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 5.72x versus 1.57x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.