PSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

International Business Machines has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of 7.26%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $82.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.33%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $269.11 which suggests that it could fall by -4.55%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Parsons has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.643%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 48.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.26x versus 4.20x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of -17.13%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $82.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.33%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.997%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.26x versus 3.30x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of 3.62%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.85%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $82.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.33%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $122.19 which suggests that it could grow by 9.25%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Parsons has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.652%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is lower than Science Applications International's net income of $68M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.26x versus 0.74x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of -2.12%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $82.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.33%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.26x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.