OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caterpillar has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 14.06%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $126.62, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Caterpillar has an analysts' consensus of $393.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.3%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Caterpillar offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Caterpillar quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is lower than Caterpillar's net income of $2B. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Caterpillar's PE ratio is 20.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.77x versus 3.16x for Caterpillar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chart Industries has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 4.94%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat Chart Industries's return on equity of 8.5%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $126.62, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Chart Industries has an analysts' consensus of $208.39 which suggests that it could grow by 23.42%. Given that Chart Industries has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Chart Industries is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chart Industries has a beta of 1.683, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.253%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Chart Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Chart Industries pays out 12.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Chart Industries quarterly revenues of $1B. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is higher than Chart Industries's net income of $49.5M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Chart Industries's PE ratio is 34.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.77x versus 1.86x for Chart Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 6.79%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $126.62, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $102.45 which suggests that it could grow by 7.4%. Given that PACCAR has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe PACCAR is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.056%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $505.1M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.77x versus 1.55x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -173.26%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat Xos's return on equity of -104.41%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $126.62, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.64%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.77x versus 0.55x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.