CAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of -0.19%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $393.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $235.93 which suggests that it could grow by 2.62%. Given that Boeing has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.564%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.12x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 3.16x versus 2.26x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 14.4%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 24.4%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $393.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $549.20 which suggests that it could grow by 8.17%. Given that Deere & has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Deere & is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.706%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Deere & quarterly revenues of $12.5B. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Deere &'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.12x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 24.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 3.16x versus 3.12x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manitowoc has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of -1.34%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Manitowoc's return on equity of 7.29%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $393.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Manitowoc has an analysts' consensus of $11.20 which suggests that it could fall by -10.18%. Given that Manitowoc has more downside risk than Caterpillar, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Manitowoc.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manitowoc has a beta of 2.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.897%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Manitowoc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Manitowoc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Manitowoc quarterly revenues of $470.9M. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Manitowoc's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.12x while Manitowoc's PE ratio is 9.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 3.16x versus 0.21x for Manitowoc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 1.71%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Terex's return on equity of 13.48%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $393.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $51.59 which suggests that it could grow by 3.85%. Given that Terex has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Terex is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.585, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.48%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Terex offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Terex's net income of $21M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.12x while Terex's PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 3.16x versus 0.66x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.