NOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 23.95% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of -1008.83%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 29.16% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $36.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.504, which suggesting that the stock is 50.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.608%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $580.3M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $102.4K. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $139M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.23x versus 25.52x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of 23.95% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 24.81%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 29.16% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $36.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.504, which suggesting that the stock is 50.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.526%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $580.3M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $139M is higher than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 9.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.23x versus 2.25x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 23.95% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 11.47%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 29.16% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $36.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $42.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Range Resources.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.504, which suggesting that the stock is 50.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 0.633, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.745%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $580.3M, which are smaller than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $846.3M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $139M is higher than Range Resources's net income of $97.1M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 33.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.23x versus 3.54x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of 23.95% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of -23.55%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 29.16% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $36.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 495.24%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.504, which suggesting that the stock is 50.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.141%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $580.3M, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $129.9M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $139M is higher than W&T Offshore's net income of -$30.6M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.23x versus 0.48x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.