Financhill
Buy
56

MXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$8.19
Seasonality move :
3.28%
Day range:
$7.80 - $8.01
52-week range:
$5.89 - $16.00
Dividend yield:
1.28%
P/E ratio:
9.68x
P/S ratio:
2.25x
P/B ratio:
0.86x
Volume:
5.1K
Avg. volume:
60.1K
1-year change:
-35.31%
Market cap:
$16M
Revenue:
$7.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.63

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
MXC
Mexco Energy
-- -- -- -- --
APA
APA
$2B $0.51 -19.17% -61.34% $23.24
CRK
Comstock Resources
$416.7M $0.11 74.95% -93.27% $21.86
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$3.4B $2.88 35.5% -35.84% $182.20
HUSA
Houston American Energy
-- -- -- -- --
VTLE
Vital Energy
$483.7M $1.83 0.99% 84.8% $20.67
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
MXC
Mexco Energy
$7.84 -- $16M 9.68x $0.10 1.28% 2.25x
APA
APA
$18.14 $23.24 $6.5B 6.53x $0.25 5.51% 0.64x
CRK
Comstock Resources
$23.34 $21.86 $6.8B 44.41x $0.13 0% 4.74x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$136.47 $182.20 $39.9B 8.35x $1.00 3.84% 2.57x
HUSA
Houston American Energy
$10.66 -- $16.7M -- $0.00 0% 25.52x
VTLE
Vital Energy
$16.11 $20.67 $624.6M 2.46x $0.00 0% 0.31x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
MXC
Mexco Energy
-- 3.189 -- 3.43x
APA
APA
49.69% 0.557 62.24% 0.68x
CRK
Comstock Resources
58.98% 1.842 49.89% 0.32x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
26.55% 0.486 28.27% 0.72x
HUSA
Houston American Energy
-- 5.093 -- 56.21x
VTLE
Vital Energy
46.27% 2.662 281.31% 0.47x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
MXC
Mexco Energy
$794.6K $446.4K 7.6% 7.6% 23.99% -$470.9K
APA
APA
$1B $773M 8.66% 17.49% 32.25% $306M
CRK
Comstock Resources
$139.4M $126.2M -6.15% -13.7% -39.75% -$123.5M
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$1.8B $1.7B 9.23% 12.66% 47.98% $663M
HUSA
Houston American Energy
$4.4K -$1.1M -112.52% -112.52% -1037.65% -$1.3M
VTLE
Vital Energy
$178.8M $144.1M -2.52% -4.49% 5.95% $117.9M

Mexco Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns MXC or APA?

    APA has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Mexco Energy's net margin of 13.16%. Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6% beat APA's return on equity of 17.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    42.01% $0.22 $18M
    APA
    APA
    38.24% $0.96 $11.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About MXC or APA?

    Mexco Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand APA has an analysts' consensus of $23.24 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    0 0 0
    APA
    APA
    5 17 3
  • Is MXC or APA More Risky?

    Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison APA has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.622%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MXC or APA?

    Mexco Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. APA offers a yield of 5.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Mexco Energy pays 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. APA pays out 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MXC or APA?

    Mexco Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than APA quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K is lower than APA's net income of $347M. Notably, Mexco Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.68x while APA's PE ratio is 6.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mexco Energy is 2.25x versus 0.64x for APA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    2.25x 9.68x $1.9M $469.1K
    APA
    APA
    0.64x 6.53x $2.6B $347M
  • Which has Higher Returns MXC or CRK?

    Comstock Resources has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Mexco Energy's net margin of -23.65%. Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6% beat Comstock Resources's return on equity of -13.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    42.01% $0.22 $18M
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    27.18% -$0.42 $5.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About MXC or CRK?

    Mexco Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comstock Resources has an analysts' consensus of $21.86 which suggests that it could fall by -6.35%. Given that Comstock Resources has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Comstock Resources is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    0 0 0
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    2 10 1
  • Is MXC or CRK More Risky?

    Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.539%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MXC or CRK?

    Mexco Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Comstock Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mexco Energy pays 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MXC or CRK?

    Mexco Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Comstock Resources quarterly revenues of $512.9M. Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K is higher than Comstock Resources's net income of -$121.3M. Notably, Mexco Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.68x while Comstock Resources's PE ratio is 44.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mexco Energy is 2.25x versus 4.74x for Comstock Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    2.25x 9.68x $1.9M $469.1K
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    4.74x 44.41x $512.9M -$121.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns MXC or FANG?

    Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Mexco Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    42.01% $0.22 $18M
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About MXC or FANG?

    Mexco Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.20 which suggests that it could grow by 33.51%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    0 0 0
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    19 3 0
  • Is MXC or FANG More Risky?

    Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.052%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MXC or FANG?

    Mexco Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Mexco Energy pays 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MXC or FANG?

    Mexco Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Mexco Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.68x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mexco Energy is 2.25x versus 2.57x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    2.25x 9.68x $1.9M $469.1K
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.57x 8.35x $4B $1.4B
  • Which has Higher Returns MXC or HUSA?

    Houston American Energy has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Mexco Energy's net margin of -1008.83%. Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    42.01% $0.22 $18M
    HUSA
    Houston American Energy
    4.33% -$0.70 $7M
  • What do Analysts Say About MXC or HUSA?

    Mexco Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mexco Energy has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Mexco Energy is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    0 0 0
    HUSA
    Houston American Energy
    0 0 0
  • Is MXC or HUSA More Risky?

    Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.608%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MXC or HUSA?

    Mexco Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mexco Energy pays 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MXC or HUSA?

    Mexco Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $102.4K. Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M. Notably, Mexco Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.68x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mexco Energy is 2.25x versus 25.52x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    2.25x 9.68x $1.9M $469.1K
    HUSA
    Houston American Energy
    25.52x -- $102.4K -$1M
  • Which has Higher Returns MXC or VTLE?

    Vital Energy has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Mexco Energy's net margin of -3.68%. Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    42.01% $0.22 $18M
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    34.91% -$0.50 $5B
  • What do Analysts Say About MXC or VTLE?

    Mexco Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 28.29%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    0 0 0
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    1 8 0
  • Is MXC or VTLE More Risky?

    Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 1.597, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.665%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MXC or VTLE?

    Mexco Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mexco Energy pays 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MXC or VTLE?

    Mexco Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $512.2M. Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K is higher than Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Mexco Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.68x while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mexco Energy is 2.25x versus 0.31x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MXC
    Mexco Energy
    2.25x 9.68x $1.9M $469.1K
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    0.31x 2.46x $512.2M -$18.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?

GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.

Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17

Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock