MTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Horace Mann Educators has a net margin of 60.56% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 9.55%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat Horace Mann Educators's return on equity of 9.03%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Horace Mann Educators has an analysts' consensus of $46.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.8%. Given that Horace Mann Educators has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Horace Mann Educators is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horace Mann Educators has a beta of 0.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.573%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Horace Mann Educators offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Horace Mann Educators pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.2M, which are smaller than Horace Mann Educators quarterly revenues of $400.1M. MGIC Investment's net income of $185.5M is higher than Horace Mann Educators's net income of $38.2M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Horace Mann Educators's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.30x versus 1.08x for Horace Mann Educators. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 60.56% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 13.2%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.01%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.369%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Heritage Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGIC Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.2M, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $230.9M. MGIC Investment's net income of $185.5M is higher than Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Heritage Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 8.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.30x versus 0.78x for Heritage Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kemper has a net margin of 60.56% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 8.38%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat Kemper's return on equity of 12.61%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Kemper has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 34.98%. Given that Kemper has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Kemper is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kemper has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.947%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Kemper offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Kemper pays out 25.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.2M, which are smaller than Kemper quarterly revenues of $1.2B. MGIC Investment's net income of $185.5M is higher than Kemper's net income of $99.7M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Kemper's PE ratio is 11.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.30x versus 0.84x for Kemper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Republic International has a net margin of 60.56% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 11.59%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat Old Republic International's return on equity of 12.83%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.53%. On the other hand Old Republic International has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.38%. Given that Old Republic International has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Old Republic International is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Republic International has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.2%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Old Republic International offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Republic International pays out 31.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.2M, which are smaller than Old Republic International quarterly revenues of $2.1B. MGIC Investment's net income of $185.5M is lower than Old Republic International's net income of $245M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Old Republic International's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.30x versus 1.13x for Old Republic International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.