HRTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Horace Mann Educators has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Heritage Insurance Holdings's net margin of 9.55%. Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99% beat Horace Mann Educators's return on equity of 9.03%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.01%. On the other hand Horace Mann Educators has an analysts' consensus of $46.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.8%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Horace Mann Educators, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Horace Mann Educators.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horace Mann Educators has a beta of 0.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.573%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Horace Mann Educators offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Horace Mann Educators pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Horace Mann Educators's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $230.9M, which are smaller than Horace Mann Educators quarterly revenues of $400.1M. Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M is lower than Horace Mann Educators's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Heritage Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Horace Mann Educators's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heritage Insurance Holdings is 0.78x versus 1.08x for Horace Mann Educators. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Heritage Insurance Holdings's net margin of 21.07%. Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99% beat Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 29.23%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.01%. On the other hand Kinsale Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $484.67 which suggests that it could fall by -0.04%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Kinsale Capital Group, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Kinsale Capital Group.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.095%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinsale Capital Group offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 3.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $230.9M, which are smaller than Kinsale Capital Group quarterly revenues of $423.4M. Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M is lower than Kinsale Capital Group's net income of $89.2M. Notably, Heritage Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Kinsale Capital Group's PE ratio is 27.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heritage Insurance Holdings is 0.78x versus 6.90x for Kinsale Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Heritage Insurance Holdings's net margin of 5.27%. Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99% beat Root's return on equity of 29.8%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.01%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $145.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.48%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $230.9M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $349.4M. Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M is higher than Root's net income of $18.4M. Notably, Heritage Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Root's PE ratio is 37.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heritage Insurance Holdings is 0.78x versus 1.58x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Heritage Insurance Holdings's net margin of 10.49%. Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.01%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.51%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Universal Insurance Holdings, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Universal Insurance Holdings.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.66%.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $230.9M, which are smaller than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $394.9M. Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M is lower than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Heritage Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 10.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heritage Insurance Holdings is 0.78x versus 0.46x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.