Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
20
MNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.72
Seasonality move
:
-18.95%
Day range:
$14.66 - $15.05
52-week range:
$12.40 - $20.94
Dividend yield:
18.89%
P/E ratio:
9.17x
P/S ratio:
1.57x
P/B ratio:
1.27x
Volume:
221.9K
Avg. volume:
424.7K
1-year change:
-26%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$969.6M
EPS (TTM):
$1.61
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$243.2M | $0.52 | -5.41% | 14.29% | $22.50 |
|
BKV
BKV
|
$224.4M | $0.21 | 63.01% | -- | $28.38 |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PROP
Prairie Operating
|
$106M | $0.67 | -- | -- | $8.75 |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
$81.6M | $0.02 | -20.06% | -86.36% | $2.99 |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
$789.6M | $1.26 | 25.12% | -31.03% | $39.54 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$14.77 | $22.50 | $1.7B | 9.17x | $0.79 | 18.89% | 1.57x |
|
BKV
BKV
|
$21.98 | $28.38 | $1.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.63x |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
$0.49 | -- | $7.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.56x |
|
PROP
Prairie Operating
|
$3.55 | $8.75 | $155.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
$0.74 | $2.99 | $153.6M | 2.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.43x |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
$25.71 | $39.54 | $2.9B | 3.60x | $0.20 | 3.03% | 1.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
100% | 0.324 | 25% | 0.58x |
|
BKV
BKV
|
11.89% | 0.000 | 11.24% | 0.35x |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
169.83% | 0.000 | 42.01% | 0.25x |
|
PROP
Prairie Operating
|
62.99% | 1.934 | 90.54% | 0.55x |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
34.43% | 0.764 | 193.7% | 0.38x |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
38.42% | 1.648 | 80.13% | 0.47x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$62.5M | $51.7M | 48.14% | 28.43% | 14.9% | $91.1M |
|
BKV
BKV
|
$187.7M | $58.5M | -10.06% | -12.23% | -45.15% | -$34.8M |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
-- | -$2.1M | -176.32% | -- | -575.31% | -$3.5M |
|
PROP
Prairie Operating
|
$7.6M | $1.8M | -20.22% | -42.11% | -9.12% | $1.9M |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
$31.3M | $22.4M | 5.67% | 8.47% | 25.46% | -$3.4M |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
$344.6M | $293.5M | 12.99% | 20.29% | 32.92% | $54.2M |
Mach Natural Resources LP vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or BKV?
BKV has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of -34.55%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat BKV's return on equity of -12.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M BKVBKV82.45% -$0.93 $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or BKV?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.34%. On the other hand BKV has an analysts' consensus of $28.38 which suggests that it could grow by 29.1%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than BKV, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than BKV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 BKVBKV7 0 0 -
Is MNR or BKV More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BKV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or BKV?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.89%. BKV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. BKV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or BKV?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are smaller than BKV quarterly revenues of $227.7M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than BKV's net income of -$78.7M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.17x while BKV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.57x versus 2.63x for BKV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.57x 9.17x $226.8M $15.9M BKVBKV2.63x -- $227.7M -$78.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or NEHC?
New Era Helium has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of -1017.06%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat New Era Helium's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M NEHCNew Era Helium-- -$0.24 $3.9M -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or NEHC?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.34%. On the other hand New Era Helium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than New Era Helium.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 NEHCNew Era Helium0 0 0 -
Is MNR or NEHC More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or NEHC?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.89%. New Era Helium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. New Era Helium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or NEHC?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are larger than New Era Helium quarterly revenues of $326.5K. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.17x while New Era Helium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.57x versus 5.56x for New Era Helium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.57x 9.17x $226.8M $15.9M NEHCNew Era Helium5.56x -- $326.5K -$3.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or PROP?
Prairie Operating has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of -19.26%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M PROPPrairie Operating55.9% -$3.49 $600.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or PROP?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.34%. On the other hand Prairie Operating has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 146.48%. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than Mach Natural Resources LP, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than Mach Natural Resources LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 PROPPrairie Operating2 1 0 -
Is MNR or PROP More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.905, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.519%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or PROP?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.89%. Prairie Operating offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Prairie Operating pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or PROP?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are larger than Prairie Operating quarterly revenues of $13.6M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.17x while Prairie Operating's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.57x versus -- for Prairie Operating. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.57x 9.17x $226.8M $15.9M PROPPrairie Operating-- -- $13.6M -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or REI?
Ring Energy has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 11.52%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M REIRing Energy39.58% $0.05 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or REI?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.34%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could grow by 301.43%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Mach Natural Resources LP, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Mach Natural Resources LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 REIRing Energy1 1 0 -
Is MNR or REI More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.407%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or REI?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.89%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or REI?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.17x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.57x versus 0.43x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.57x 9.17x $226.8M $15.9M REIRing Energy0.43x 2.07x $79.1M $9.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or SM?
SM Energy has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 21.71%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M SMSM Energy41.05% $1.59 $7.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or SM?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.34%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.54 which suggests that it could grow by 53.49%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Mach Natural Resources LP, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Mach Natural Resources LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 SMSM Energy7 6 0 -
Is MNR or SM More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 2.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.558%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or SM?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.89%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or SM?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $839.6M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $182.3M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.17x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.57x versus 1.00x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.57x 9.17x $226.8M $15.9M SMSM Energy1.00x 3.60x $839.6M $182.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.
