PROP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chord Energy has a net margin of -19.26% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 18.09%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11% beat Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.86%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 146.48%. On the other hand Chord Energy has an analysts' consensus of $133.32 which suggests that it could grow by 30.45%. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than Chord Energy, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than Chord Energy.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.905, which suggesting that the stock is 90.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chord Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chord Energy offers a yield of 6.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are smaller than Chord Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Chord Energy's net income of $219.8M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chord Energy's PE ratio is 6.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 1.09x for Chord Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of -19.26% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 14.11%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11% beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 7.85%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 146.48%. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.25 which suggests that it could grow by 131.93%. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than HighPeak Energy, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than HighPeak Energy.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.905, which suggesting that the stock is 90.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are smaller than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $257.4M. Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M is lower than HighPeak Energy's net income of $36.3M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 9.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 1.03x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a net margin of -19.26% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 7.01%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11% beat Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 146.48%. On the other hand Mach Natural Resources LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 52.34%. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than Mach Natural Resources LP, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than Mach Natural Resources LP.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.905, which suggesting that the stock is 90.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mach Natural Resources LP offers a yield of 18.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP pays out 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are smaller than Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues of $226.8M. Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mach Natural Resources LP's PE ratio is 9.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 1.57x for Mach Natural Resources LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Era Helium has a net margin of -19.26% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of -1017.06%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11% beat New Era Helium's return on equity of --.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 146.48%. On the other hand New Era Helium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than New Era Helium.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.905, which suggesting that the stock is 90.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Era Helium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Era Helium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are larger than New Era Helium quarterly revenues of $326.5K. Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M is higher than New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Era Helium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 5.56x for New Era Helium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.