MCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of -11.3% compared to Marcus's net margin of 17.46%. Marcus's return on equity of -2.8% beat Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $24.67, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.82%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Marcus, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Marcus.

Marcus has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.88% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.08%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are larger than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Marcus's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Cineverse's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while Cineverse's PE ratio is 72.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.73x versus 1.42x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Walt Disney has a net margin of -11.3% compared to Marcus's net margin of 13.87%. Marcus's return on equity of -2.8% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 8.4%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $24.67, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $129.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that Marcus has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney, analysts believe Marcus is more attractive than The Walt Disney.

Marcus has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.88% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.842%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $23.6B. Marcus's net income of -$16.8M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 24.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.73x versus 2.32x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of -11.3% compared to Marcus's net margin of -4.25%. Marcus's return on equity of -2.8% beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.53%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $24.67, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 99.5%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Marcus, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Marcus.

Marcus has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.88% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.989%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $23.8M. Marcus's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Gaia's net income of -$1M. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.73x versus 1.02x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -11.3% compared to Marcus's net margin of 2.11%. Marcus's return on equity of -2.8% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $24.67, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -7.63%. Given that Marcus has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Marcus is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Marcus has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.88% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.406%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Marcus's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.73x versus 0.30x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.