GAIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of -4.25% compared to Gaia's net margin of 17.46%. Gaia's return on equity of -5.53% beat Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.5%. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.82%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Cineverse, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Cineverse.

Gaia has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.989% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.08%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $23.8M, which are smaller than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Gaia's net income of -$1M is lower than Cineverse's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cineverse's PE ratio is 72.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.02x versus 1.42x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Media has a net margin of -4.25% compared to Gaia's net margin of 1.12%. Gaia's return on equity of -5.53% beat Liberty Media's return on equity of -1.44%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.5%. On the other hand Liberty Media has an analysts' consensus of $100.17 which suggests that it could grow by 9.45%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Liberty Media, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Liberty Media.

Gaia has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.989% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Media has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.431%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $23.8M, which are smaller than Liberty Media quarterly revenues of $447M. Gaia's net income of -$1M is lower than Liberty Media's net income of $5M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liberty Media's PE ratio is 73.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.02x versus 6.43x for Liberty Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -4.25% compared to Gaia's net margin of 2.11%. Gaia's return on equity of -5.53% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.5%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -7.63%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Gaia has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.989% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.406%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $23.8M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Gaia's net income of -$1M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.02x versus 0.30x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a net margin of -4.25% compared to Gaia's net margin of 3.82%. Gaia's return on equity of -5.53% beat Dave & Buster's Entertainment's return on equity of 17.61%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.5%. On the other hand Dave & Buster's Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Dave & Buster's Entertainment, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Dave & Buster's Entertainment.

Gaia has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.989% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a beta of 2.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.275%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dave & Buster's Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dave & Buster's Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $23.8M, which are smaller than Dave & Buster's Entertainment quarterly revenues of $567.7M. Gaia's net income of -$1M is lower than Dave & Buster's Entertainment's net income of $21.7M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dave & Buster's Entertainment's PE ratio is 29.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.02x versus 0.55x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.