LEVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of --. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 20.43% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $23.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $67M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.56x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.33x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FIGS has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of -0.08%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 20.43% beat FIGS's return on equity of 0.3%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $23.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand FIGS has an analysts' consensus of $4.61 which suggests that it could fall by -21.26%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than FIGS.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FIGS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. FIGS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. FIGS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than FIGS quarterly revenues of $124.9M. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $67M is higher than FIGS's net income of -$102K. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.56x while FIGS's PE ratio is 586.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.33x versus 1.80x for FIGS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 1.9%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 20.43% beat Nike's return on equity of 23.12%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $23.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $75.77 which suggests that it could grow by 5.09%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Nike.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.963%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Nike offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $67M is lower than Nike's net income of $211M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.56x while Nike's PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.33x versus 2.32x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Champion Homes has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 6.12%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 20.43% beat Champion Homes's return on equity of 13.34%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $23.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Champion Homes has an analysts' consensus of $81.24 which suggests that it could grow by 25.83%. Given that Champion Homes has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe Champion Homes is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Champion Homes has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.226%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Champion Homes offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Champion Homes pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Champion Homes quarterly revenues of $593.9M. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $67M is higher than Champion Homes's net income of $36.3M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.56x while Champion Homes's PE ratio is 18.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.33x versus 1.51x for Champion Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.