FIGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -0.08% compared to FIGS's net margin of -3528.43%. FIGS's return on equity of 0.3% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.61, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than FIGS.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $124.9M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. FIGS's net income of -$102K is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 586.00x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.80x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Levi Strauss & has a net margin of -0.08% compared to FIGS's net margin of 4.63%. FIGS's return on equity of 0.3% beat Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 20.43%.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.61, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Levi Strauss & has an analysts' consensus of $23.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.32%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than FIGS.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.412%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Levi Strauss & offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & pays out 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $124.9M, which are smaller than Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues of $1.4B. FIGS's net income of -$102K is lower than Levi Strauss &'s net income of $67M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 586.00x while Levi Strauss &'s PE ratio is 20.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.80x versus 1.33x for Levi Strauss &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Movado Group has a net margin of -0.08% compared to FIGS's net margin of 1.08%. FIGS's return on equity of 0.3% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39%.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.61, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 94.09%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than FIGS.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.901%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Movado Group offers a yield of 8.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $124.9M, which are smaller than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $131.8M. FIGS's net income of -$102K is lower than Movado Group's net income of $1.4M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 586.00x while Movado Group's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.80x versus 0.56x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -0.08% compared to FIGS's net margin of --. FIGS's return on equity of 0.3% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.61, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FIGS has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe FIGS is more attractive than Northann.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $124.9M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. FIGS's net income of -$102K is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 586.00x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.80x versus 0.32x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.